Monday, January 31, 2005

A Traveshamockery

Jeff and I went to Taco Bell today. It's Jeff's birthday, but it turns out they don't give you five bucks-worth of free food for that any more. I had to foot Jeff's bill (for the second-straight fast food trip, but that's another story). Overly serious reactions ensued.
Here's an email I, along with many others, recieved from Jeff:

To all my brothers and sisters of Ann Arbor,


As you may well know, today, January 31st, is my birthday. On one's birthday,
there are certain truths to be held self-evident, certain inalienable rights
that are to be cherished and celebrated like those spoken of by our forefathers
in the events leading up to the American Revolution. One of these such rights
was five dollars worth of free Taco Bell upon the presentation of a valid ID.
Brothers and sisters, the Taco Bell birthday gratuity is no more. I cannot
think of one instance since the end of the Holocaust, all those sixty years go,
where our Basic Human Rights have been so senselessly and maliciously
disregarded. A couple of minutes ago, I sent this comment to the people at
www.tacobell.com:

"I am severely disappointed to learn that you have discontinued the five dollar
birthday gratuity. I have enjoyed the fast, friendly service of the Stadium
Boulevard Taco Bell for over two years, and have twice taken advantage of what
I took to be a form of the sincerest hospitality on the part of your company. I
came in today with no money at all, expecting surely to be received with
enthusiasm and congratulated by your caring and interested staff, but instead
had to experience the shame and guilt that comes with begging one's friend to
pay for his meal. And on my birthday, nonetheless. Shame on you, Taco Bell.

I attend the University of Michigan, which, as you may know, is one of the most
academically challenging schools in the nation. As such, it is also one of the
most expensive schools in the nation. Though I have a part-time job, money is
still tight for me. It was a good feeling to know that there was at least one
day a year when I didn't have to worry about paying for food, that I could rely
on Taco Bell for a delicious, fast, and fresh meal. I had faith in Taco Bell.
Today, that faith was dashed.

Your commercials urge consumers to think outside the bun. I, as a consumer,
urge you to think outside the bottom line and reinstate the five dollar
birthday gratuity."

If we work together, friends, we can force change. Bob Wolfer and Will Yates,
for instance, are currently interning for members of our state legislature. I
urge them to go to their respective representatives and notify them of this
horrifying breach of Human Rights. And the rest of you, I urge you to write
Taco Bell and encourage them to reconsider their rash and harsh decision to
take away that five dollars to which we are entitled. Even a quick phone call
will suffice. Taco Bell can be reached at 1-800-TAC-OBEL.

And I encourage you also, friends and kind spirits, to send this email to
everyone you can think of, so that the news of this atrocity spreads like
wildfire all across the great globe. The masses will rise up, and we will have
our due!

Thank you all, and Godspeed,
Your humble servant,

Jeffrey A. Pickell
I decided to back Jeff up, and submitted this comment (limited to 250 words!) to tacobell.com:

Today I was hoping to save some cash and go to work just a little bit hungry. But when my good friend Jeff came to me and said that he planned to visit your restaurant and collect the $5-worth of Mexican food Taco Bell so kindly gives those celebrating their birthdays (as he is today), I decided I would think outside the bun that was my financial plan and accompany him. Little did I know that by the time I left the store, my plans to save cash would not have simply been compromised, they would have been utterly destroyed.

To make a short story under 250 words, Jeff and I were disappointed to learn that Taco Bell no longer gives $5 of free food to those celebrating their birthday- not even frequent, loyal customers like Jeff! We were dismayed at this fact, especially given that Jeff, who appreciates the low-cost options available at Taco Bell and had not intended to order more than $5 worth of food, had not brought any money with him! This meant that I had to pay for Jeff's food so that my friend would not be left hungry (hungry in a restaurant!). With Jeff's food added to the already very (overly?) expensive cost of a Chicken Enchilada Grilled Stuft Burrito Combo, I spent $11, considerably more than I had planned on spending before this ordeal began. Your cost-effective new policy improves the bottom line at the expense of your loyal customers.

So spread the word. And don't go to Taco Bell on your birthday without any cash.

Thursday, January 27, 2005

From the Archives

Here's a tasty morsel I wrote last spring. I copied and pasted it in here, so the code looks like it's a little messed up. Oh well.

My sister had a link to a great webpage in her AIM profile. I've decided to write a little bit about it instead of working on the research paper I desperately need to finish.


The Link In Question


If you've clicked the link and perused the page, you've noticed that it is a hilarious rant by a fundamentalist Christian. It starts out discussing "evolutionist propaganda" on PBS, but eventually moves to constructing a theory about how Macintosh computers are part of a satanic dark empire or some such nonsense. Really quite remarkable.


I really love the language he uses. Phrases like "forces of darkness" and "anti-Christian hate literature" make me giggle. Another great thing to look for is his use of words like "clearly" and "obviously" before outlandish statements. It's hard to argue with the fact that Apple's logo "is clearly a reference to the Fall, when Adam and Eve were tempted with an apple by the serpent," isn't it? It's also humorous the way he portrays the Apple Coproration as some sort of marginalized, insidious force working behind the scenes of society to advance their "evolutionist" and "satanist" (same thing, of course) agenda. I mean, I'm not a big fan of Macs either, but it's because I can't get over the one-button mouse, not because "[t]hey're not doing a very good job keeping their ties to the forces of darkness a secret," which is why Dr. Richard Paley sticks with his trusty PC, which was, of course, created by God the Father Himself. After reading his persuasive piece of scholarship (what you write has to be scholarship if you're a doctor, right?), however, I'm starting to think the liberals here at Michigan must have ulterior motives for all of those Macs in the Angell Hall computer lab. Apple computers do, after all, "promote Godless Darwinism and Communism."


I'm not sure if there's a point to all of this. I guess it would just be that this guy is a loon.



Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Indie Rock

Cosmopolitan magazine named Ashlee Simpson their "Fun Fearless Female of the Year." If I were a female, I would be insulted that the editors of this publication thought that this girl was the best my gender could muster in 2004.
In the congratulatory interview, reprinted here, on Ashlee's official site, she refers to her music as both "indie" and "rock". Her desperate and sickening attempts to legitimize herself in that article caused me to go right out (well, out on the web, any way) and sign the petition asking her to stop what she's doing.

If only it stood a chance of working.

Monday, January 24, 2005

Grad Lib Limericks

I'm sitting up on the sixth floor
Not having any fun nor
Accomplishing much
My thesis is such
That I don't want to do it no more

My thesis will look mighty good
When it done, but for now I should
Continue to write
All day and all night
Or remain unfinished it could

Concentrate? No, I cannot
Keep my poor mind on one thought
It wanders at will
And will wander until
My time has been all spent for naught

Download some Pop Project songs!

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

College Football Makes Me Sad

PRE-ENTRY NOTE: I just read on roomie Will's blog willyates.com that he has been getting referrals from my blog. Now, I'm no internet expert, but my critical thinking skills are top-notch, and to me that means that somebody must be reading my blog... Hot damn! As soon as I saw that, I figured I'd better get a post up ASAP. So here goes...

Actually, college football makes me excited. Really excited. Way too excited. Which makes me sad. You see, despite the fact that my Wolverines lost a heartbreaking Rose Bowl, despite the fact that it's still January, and despite the fact that I won't be a student at U of M in the fall and therefore won't have student season tickets anymore, I can't freakin' wait for the 2005 college football season. I'm sad because a) I'm excited way too early and b) My excitement is leading up to the dissapointing realization that I won't be nearly as involved with college football come the fall. But I don't really want to discuss my sadness. I want to discuss my excitement.

I'm excited because the Maize and Blue are going to be really good. I'm also excited because the entire Big 10 conference should be amazing. The Wolverines are getting a lot of respect in the pre-pre-pre-season rankings that have been coming out recently, as have the rest of the Big 10. Sports Illustrated has Michigan at #2. Pat Forde from espn.com, whose article is mysteriously unavailable on that website now, had us (Or is it them now? Sad!) at #3. collegefootballnews.com, whose opinions I generally respect and give a lot of credence to, has the boys in the winged helmets at #13. Until we settle some issues with our secondary, I'm more inclined to go along with Fiu at CFN.
With the Big 10 being as tough as it looks to be shaping up to be, it will be tough for any team to get through it unscathed. CFN has both Iowa and Ohio State in the top 5. So there will be some really good teams in the Big 10 next year. At Iowa looks to be Michigan's toughest game, and given the Hawkeyes' recent history there, I'm chalking it up as a probable loss. UM can beat Ohio State at home, especially with the added motivation of making up for the emberassment in Columbus in '04. If the Bucks can win the battle of the 'Eyes, then we could have a three-way tie for the top if they all run the table otherwise. That would be kinda fun, especially since UM would be keeping those dicks (yeah, I called them dicks) from Columbus the outright title on that sure to be grey, chilly day in November. Of course, anything can happen. Purdue, Minnesota, Penn State and Michigan State are all looking like teams that could beat anybody on a given day. And of course this prediction of the Buckeyes being good depends on their even being able to field a team after the NCAA gets done with them.
So I'm excited about college football in 2005. I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict Iowa vs. Texas in the Rose Bowl for the National Title. But I'm gonna be pulling hard for a UM vs UT rematch for all the marbles. If that happens, I'll be there, I don't care how poor I am next year. Man, thinking about how poor and not in the Big House I'm going to be next year is making me sad again. College football makes me sad.

Thursday, January 06, 2005

Goings On

If you read this entry, leave a comment. I'm pretty sure that no one has ever read my blog. How discouraging .

It's been a while. A number of things have happened that have been of interest to me since my last post. I'll discuss a few of them.
First, congratulations to my boyhood hero Ryne Sandberg, who was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame last week. I had at least three Ryno posters in my room growing up, and I'm honestly a little bit emotional over him finally making it on his third try. Every article I've read about him says he obviously deserved to be in, so I wonder who has been voting against him. Sandberg's '89 Central Division champ Cubs are one of my earliest and fondest sports memories.
I saw "Blade Trinity" while I was in LA with Ashley for the Rose Bowl. Not a great movie, but not a disappointment. Sure, David Goyer should not have been allowed to direct because he did a crappy and I mean crappy job of it, but, damn, it still had the Daywalker slaying suckheads! Plus Parker Posey was great as the arch-villainess, really going to town with her over-the-top, B-movie character. At first I didn't like Ryan Reynolds, but I warmed up to him.
Most critics didn't like "Blade Trinity" (witness its abysmal 27% TomatoMeter rating. They rag on the direction and say its not as smart as the previous two. For the most part they're right. But, like I said above, it still has the Daywalker slaying suckheads, for crying out loud.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?